Increasingly over the years, I have had more people tell me that they think that I am a visionary.  While I truly wish that was significantly true–and, from time to time, I even pray that the Lord would make me more visionary–I think that I am actually minimally visionary and much more a “big picture” thinker, who also happens to have some ability in connecting the two.

In that regard, I tend to absorb the details that everybody else is focusing on, then fairly naturally and quickly back away and consider what the event(s) currently in the white-hot glare of the spotlight mean against the wider backdrop of more or less related events.  Of course, that does not mean my putting together of the puzzle pieces is any more accurate than anybody else’s (though I have been fairly close to right a fair amount more often than not over the years, although most of what I was thinking in those situations was unpublished, just laid out to friends and colleagues).

Of course, let me tell you up front that I truly hope some of the things I am about to say are not true, or do not come to pass.  But, at the moment, the following are my considered, though “not a prophet or a son of one,”  takes in these areas.  See whether you agree or disagree with my reworked quotes and related thinking:

With every action, you are stirring up what will likely be an opposite and equal reaction- This, of course, is a rough application of Newton’s Third Law to wider life.  Allow me to muse a tad as to how it applies to the SBC here and now.

The last time the International Mission Board trustees pulled a major league bonehead stunt was in the Fall of 2005.  What they did not foresee happening was that the adding of the two “apocryphal” policies on baptism and private private prayer language was the arrogant over-the-top action that would bring about the strong reaction(s) of: 1) getting Frank Page elected president of the SBC in Greensboro over two candidates hand-picked by Paige Patterson and Paul Pressler respectively; and 2) the almost 58% majority passage of the Garner Motion on the BFM2000 in San Antonio.

Now, the IMB BoT has effectively “martyred” Wade Burleson.  Can they really be so short-sighted as to not realize that, in doing so, they may have cost Al Mohler the presidency of the Convention in Indianapolis?  What were they thinking?!  After all, this is a role Mohler desperately wants, so that he can be prez when the SBC is in Louisville the next year. 

Yes, “the natives (on the SBC reservation) are restless” and the IMB (and SWBTS, I might add) trustees have done absolutely nothing to soothe their unrest.  In fact, they have done exactly the opposite.  How can we explain that?

Power corrupts and absolute power blinds the powerful.  With all due respect to Lord Acton’s timeless quote, this is a rip-off that desperately needs to be chewed on in the SBC right now. 

Think about it: Leaders are strong-willed people.  Leaders who stay in power for very long, even if subconsciosuly, surround themselves with people who not only think like they do but, to keep their jobs and curry favor with the powerful one, morph into “yes men.”  As a result, before long, all the power broker hears is ego-stroking: how wonderful he is and how stupid or crazy anyone is who disagrees with the leader–even if they know down deep that it is the powerful one who is out of bounds on more and more issues (and that he can’t see it because he is blinded by his ego).

In other words, because power fans the flame of pride, and, over time, the possibility of anything humbling getting through to the power broker dies like the embers of a fire, there is a fairly certain outcome for those who stay in power without very close and constant accountability: power profoundly blinds the powerful.

Suffice it to say that the current situation in the SBC has more or less devolved into a “might makes right” landscape.  It’s like the parent whose only answer to every “Why?” question from the kids is “Because I say so,” which, by interpretation, means, “It doesn’t matter if I’m really right; you must live with it as ’right’ because I say so.”  And, because the parent is angry, perhaps even surly, when he or she says this, the kid clams up and loses all respect for the parent.

In the SBC, just about all the true power brokers have left is raw power.  Their repeated, often angry, abuse of power in situations when it was not right or warranted has lost the respect of all but their most blind unthinking followers. 

Now, this does not mean that there are not many, many who appreciate greatly and respect what these leaders accomplished two or three decades ago–myself included.  But, thinking people only respect those are truly respectable and trust those who are truly trustworthy.  Amd, frankly, those who demand the ascendancy of their own narrower viewpoints and courses of action in the face of what is clearly the view of the majority of Southern Baptists (e.g., the Lifeway survey on tongues/private prayer language) are not acting in ways that engender either respect or trust.  Like selfish little children, they want their way and, in their arrogant blindness, that is reason enough why.

All that is necessary for the triumph of fundamentalist encroachment in the SBC is for non-fundamentalists to not even care enough to stand up and be counted.  Edmund Burke may have rolled over in his grave on this one.  But, again, this is an application of his timeless words that must burn into our minds and hearts in the months ahead.

My friend, and fellow blogger, Bob Cleveland, has just laid out his thoughts on the SBC more and more painting itself into a “corner of irrelevance.”  While I completely agree with Bob that it is happening, I must say that I am most concerned because I think that is precisely the way the SBC power elite want all reform-minded Southern Baptists to think.  Why do I say that?

Well, the more you think of the SBC as irrelevant, the more you tend to remove yourself from involvement in the processes of who gets elected to what position, what motions get introduced–generally, what directions things are going to go in the future.  What happens then?  It just effectively hands things over to the high and mighty and their ever-narrowing perspective without opposition.  In other words, the more each of you ceases to care about what has been, and is currently being, crammed down your throat, the easier it is for them to cram the next issue down the throats of those left who do care.

Yes, I hate that Wade is having to endure this completely unjust pain–and, I have had some of a lesser nature inflicted on me.  But, all of what has happened does not add up to anywhere close to suffcient reason to pack your bags and walk away.  Do you not remember that the energizing of a relatively small number of messengers in Greensboro and San Antonio (given the 6 million plus in the SBC) made a huge difference?  And, the encouraging events in the state conventions in Missouri and Arkansas, and some other behind the scenes events, are making it begin to appear that the actual numbers of remaining hard-core Resurgence types are like the Wizard of Oz (i.e., sounding much bigger and stronger only because well-positioned and louder).

In conclusion, let me say that I think that there are a huge number of Southern Baptists whose consciences are pretty much exactly where I have tagged things in this post.  More and more of you have let me know that, in one way or another, over these past months.  However, a fair number of you need to trust the Lord to help you “grow a backbone.”

Be brutally honest with yourself: How much good does it do for you to agree with my analysis, or that of some other reform blogger, if you are not willing to do anything about it?  Your fear-frozen–or ceasing-to-care-anymore–inaction is effectively the same thing Edmund Burke rightly contends allows very bad things to happen.

Boys and girls, as I’ve said before, I am, in the flesh, a chicken–a 250-plus pound coward.  But, by faith, the Holy Spirit has given me a voice–and a backbone.  And, He will do the same for you too, if you ask Him to–and trust Him to do it.

Coming Friday: “Fridays are for Newspaper Articles”

7 Responses to “Break in series (Continued): “More Midstream Musings””

  1. Samuel Creed said

    Well, I guess I’m guilty.

    Our Tennessee Baptist Convwention, in just an hour or so will adjourn after having by majority vote, but not by any means overwhelming, narrowed the playing field for those who would be active in the Convention. The BFM 2000 will now be used as a litmus test for committees, etc., in order to secure complete “doctrinal accountability” in the TBC. The accountability will presumably be to the very narrow minded good Baptists who see most Churches and Tennessee Baptists as apostate and in need of Church discipline and a good lashing to get all the “liberalism” out of them. Sorry for the sarcasam. However, I did not attend because I am tired of the fight. The CR group won, not without a fight, but I wasn’t in the fight. I remember in Vietnam, 1969, I was tired, homesick, listening to all the political controversy in the media, and I wanted to just quit, refuse to continue, and be sent home. I went to an Army Field Hospital when dozens of wounded troops from the 173rd Airborne were being brought in. That sight got my attention. You can’t quit when brothers and sisters are being wounded.

    I deserve your rebuke, yet still I’m not sure what can be done to stop the CR wrecking crews in our Convention demanding doctrinal conformity.

    Sam

    Sam,

    About all I can say about what happened in the Tennessee Convention is “At least they didn’t go beyond the BFM2000,” as has happened with the NAMB, IMB ans SWBTS trustees. And, yes, it was a very narrow victory, which, when you factor in that the proponents of what passed were more organized than the opponents tells me that the narrowing bunch doesn’t really have the numbers, they just have a vision and strategy.

    I sense the vision, strategy and related matters is coming soon on the reform side and am encouraged,
    Boyd

  2. Ah but Boyd, there’s a big difference between the power we see in a government and the power we see in the SBC. As citizens, we cannot remove ourselves from the power of the US government and still stay here. We can’t personally secede from the union.

    But as church members, or as local bodies of believers, we can ignore the SBC, re-direct the money God has entrusted to us, and go our merry way never missing a beat. If enough of the right kinds of folks do that, the SBC will be left with the dregs who don’t care. That, in fact, may be the equivalent of God’s giving folks up to their own perverted minds.

    Or another way of calling in the Babylonians.

    Bob,

    You’re right and that was my point in the post. I think the powers that be have a strategy to run off all dissenters by painting us in your “corner of irrelevance.” So, the way to make the SBC more relevant is to reform it, not give up and walk away.

    For whatever it’s worth,
    Boyd

  3. Alan Cross said

    Interesting thoughts, Boyd. The problem with what you are saying, though, is that some of us don’t know how to speak up any louder than what we have. It’s not about not having a backbone, it is about investing your life in something that makes a difference. When you speak and speak and speak and the leaders of the Convention who agree with you don’t stand up and say anything or bring changes because THEY are afraid, then what are you fighting for?

    Alan,

    Principle–biblical principle. After reading J.P. Moreland’s ‘Kingdom Triangle,’ I came to realize (although I don’t think he actually said this, but I implied it) that a lot of us don’t want to be involved in something unless there is assured victory that will not take too long. In that respect, we are pragmatists who want immediate gratification.

    My brother, your efforts were not wasted. My anonymous professor friend has contacts in high places around the SBC, as I also do. Yes, those who agree with reform efforts are afraid for their jobs, and also with getting their reputations trashed by the power elite. But, without question, unlike two years ago, they are now under no mistaken perspective that they are alone in their misgivings and desire for change. No, I honestly don’t know what it is going to take to get them to “come out of the closet,” but I do know there are many profs, administrators and pastors who, while still going along with the CR stuff so as to not rock the boat, have attitudinally departed the CR fold and are just waiting to see what’s going to happen. Relatedly, what the Lord chooses to use as catalysts for great change has been incredibly diverse in the past and is unpredictable right now in this case. But, I firmly believe it will show itself in His perfect timing.

    How ’bout them Bullies last Saturday?!
    Boyd

  4. Bennett Willis said

    To rephrase some of what I said on Bob’s blog–in my personal and church life I am free to ignore the present management of the SBC. My church and I are autonomous in almost all ways and to a great extent we do ignore the SBC. However, if I wanted to be a missionary, SBC employee, seminary student, or any of several other roles–I could not ignore this management but would have to live with it and cooperate with it because it is making the rules.

    The concept of cooperation to do more than any of us can do individually is a proven one. It should not be abandoned because it is currently being managed by people who think that they are responsible only to God—and that on a peer to peer basis.

    Bennett Willis

    Bennett,

    Touche!

    I understand Winston Churchill famously said of a particularly egomaniacal fellow MP: “There, but for the grace of God, walks God.” Tragically, that could be said about some at the highest level in the SBC today.

    Blessings, Boyd

  5. Samuel Creed said

    Thanks for the response. My fear (I say fear because I don’t have inside information) is that the next step beyond the BFM 2000 are rabbinicalesque add-ons. If all our convention leaders sign on the dotted BFM 2000 line in a Patterson type ceremony, then they are still there “in power.” Since, this oppositional group, see the convention leaders as flaming liberals, so stated in our State paper, then the only way to purge is to set up a stringent extra set of rules such as did the BOT’s at the IMB and SWBTS. I hope my analysis is within logical boundaries.

    But, I do have a question. Have Puritans ever been successful within their Church where they were working for their purification goals–whatever those goals may have been? Dr. Bill Hendricks used to say he was the last of the Puritans during CR I, but he didn’t survive. Maybe I need more red beans and pigs feet in my diet, I don’t seem to be able to throw hard punches in more.

    Sam

    Sam,

    I am marinating in all this right now and hope to offer the beginnings of some thoughts that may be helpful next week.

    Pardon my dodging while I take some time to think deeper and wider,
    Boyd

  6. samuel Creed said

    Boyd,

    I thought about my last post and then your words in the original post. I came off too pessimistic. I concede a key battle may have been lost at the TBC Convention in Kingsport this week, however the voting was definitely and definitively split. Perhaps the focus should be on those who are willing to stay in the center, organize, and move the Convention back to a more centrist position (at least from my point of view). I suppose the next question will be about those who are willing to be public and vocal. I know I’m talking about local Baptists, and you are talking about national affairs. Is it a truism: as the SBC goes, so goes the States?
    Are Missouri and Arkansas surely a shot accross the bow of the SBC? Is momentum swinging to the “reform” side? Puritans seek to reform through dissent that brings true relevancy back to the grand old lady (SBC).

    Sam

    Sam,

    I don’t really see what happened in Tennessee as a huge defeat at all. It was very evenly split, even though the Concerned bunch organized and pushed like crazy. The same in Arkansas. Now, the SBTC pulled some nonsense, but that is to be expected in a state in which there are two state conventions.

    I do think there is a momentum swing seen in the state conventions. And, that is truly amazing since there is very little organization so far (mostly just blogging) among the reform-minded.

    Blessings, Boyd

  7. I think my whole post might be summed up in an old poem:

    “He drew a circle that shut me out
    Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout
    But love and I had the wit to win
    We drew a circle that shut him in.”

    Bob,

    What is the source of your diddy?

    Love ya, Boyd

Leave a Reply