The Holy Spirit and the Southern Baptist Convention (XL): “Whenever You Come Together, Each One…” (1 Cor. 14:26-33a)
April 24, 2008
(Note: I helped someone load a U-Haul for several hours during the late morning through lunch period. Thus, I am later than usual getting to this post and so tired that I can barely make my brain and fingers move. Consequently, if anything even remotely logical and helpful comes out of what follows, it is totally of the Lord!)
“Whenever you come together, each one has a psalm, a teaching, a revelation, a tongue or an intrepretation” (1 Cor. 14:26). Of course, the wording “come together” sounds like what we could call a “church service” today. And, it is that very fact that seems to make so many Southern Baptist and other non-Charismatic evangelicals today highly uneasy, as I discussed in my last post.
Let’s break this verse down further and see if we are still so “freaked out” by what Paul includes here. “Whenever you come together” does make it sound like something like these elements could expect to be present in any meeting of the church as a body (see ch. 12). However, the wording “each one” cannot mean that each member of a decent-sized is going to participate in each service, given that Paul quickly adds that only two or three tongues-speakers and two or three prophets should speak in a service–and the tongues-speakers only if an interpreter is present (14:27-29).
Now, it seems likely that “a revelation” is that which is spoken by a prophet, so there are to be only two or three of those per meeting. But, what seems odd at first glance here is that there is no limit mentioned to the number of those bringing forth “a psalm” or “a teaching.” The only immediate guideline stated that applies for either aspect is” “All things must be done for edification” (14:26).
What are we to make of this? Well, it certainly can’t be that prophecy is less edifiying than “a psalm” or “a teaching.” After all, in 14:3, Paul went out of the way to say: “But the person who prophesies speaks to people for edification, encouragement and consolation.”
So, what is going on? In this context, my considered guess is that the church in Corinth had proportionately more prophets and tongues-speakers than the other gifts or worship functions listed. As a result, there was a strong tendency for those two gifts to monopolize the time when the body met together. Thus, it would be have been necessary for Paul to put a limit of “two or three” on the number of prophets or tongues-speakers who participated.
As an applicational aside, in looking at 14:26, I seriously wonder if most non-Charismatic churches have not swung completely to the opposite extreme in our congregational meetings. We are so afraid of some gifts popping up their heads in our services that we have a number of songs (music ministry) and, so to speak, ”at most one” teaching or “prophecy” (if you at least partly equate modern preaching with prophecy).
Now, it is true that a great deal of the sense of strangeness we feel in regard to 14:26 is simply because we do not sense any “order of worship” there. Let’s face it: for most (at least non-Charismatic) Christians today, the idea of a worship service without a bulletin containing a well-planned layout of what is going to be done from beginning to end is almost nonsensical. And, if nothing else, that does appear to take seriously the principle on which Paul closes this chapter: “Everything must be done decently and in order” (14:40).
Of course, that cannot be exactly what Paul meant in 1 Cortinthians 14, if for no other reason than they did not have such printed church bulletins and the like. In fact, it can be argued that, if the order of service really was that big a deal in the earliest churches, we probably would have some fairly clear New Testament passages that would at least point us in certain directions. However, we do not… so, it appears that such close attention to very detailed order in worship services is quite probably the invention of a later, more formal period of church history.
As we conclude this first stanza of probing this unsettling latter part of 1 Corinthians 14, what are we to take from Paul’s words for our church services today? Allow me to suggest several thoughts that have emerged as I have reflected: 1) It appears from 14:26 that a number of persons participated in their services as individually gifted members of the body (i.e., not just as a mass ministry, such as a choir today); 2) The primary question of whether a certain person/gift should function in such a congregational setting had to do with “edification” (14:26), not entertainment; and, looking ahead to some of what I will get into next time, 3) It was possible for there to be “too much of a good thing” in regard to the ministry of some gifts (14:27-29); 4) Even more tragically, it was also quite possible for arrogance or lack of decorum or self-control to turn the worship of a highly-gifted local church into a setting of disorder and strife (14:30-33a).
What do you think?
Coming Saturday: “Saturdays are for Newspaper Articles”
I would associate modern preaching with “prophecy” when and if it fits the pattern of wise and knowledgeable forthtelling; whether that be expositional or topical, etc. Yet, it is more than one preacher preaching. It may be the “ah-ha I get it response” when a light goes on with the comments of a teacher, preacher, or fellow disciple who clarifies the Scripture with comments. Why not some dialogue within the context of the preaching monologue? This can be dicey because some people just wander around in Scripture espousing old traditional interpretations or “what I have always heard” comments. Sometimes I know I have the “Word” and could say be quiet you are chasing a rabbit.
The gifts can be subtle coming from the heart and mouth of the meekest or the outspoken. I often wonder if I missed a spiritual moment because I wasn’t listening or more intent on saying what I had prepared. We preachers aren’t given to share the power of the spoken word. A 2008 spiritual, 1C-14 Church will, to me, look like a 2008 Church filled with modern people (men and women), yet people willing to hear wisdom, knowledge, revelation, etc., from those truly energized by the Spirit. Don’t have to handle snakes, run the aisle, shout or be silent, just be sensitive to the Holy Spirit. Do we always do this here at old First Baptist? Honestly, I guess we are so set in our ways the Spirit has trouble moving us.
Sam
Sam,
Interesting comments! I’m still working on what I think prophecy is. It seems to me that it has to be more than just forthtelling. However, it also seems short-sighted to conclude that it is strictly and only foretelling. As a result, I’m in a sort of quandary as to how to recognize it today.
Perhaps you concluding thought about our being “so set in our ways that the Spirit has trouble moving us” is one of our biggest problems, if not the worst of all.
Blessings, Boyd
David Prior in John Stott’s BST Commentary on 1C says what I wanted to say about prophecy, but couldn’t succinctly articulate not an unusual problem for me). Using Isaiah 50:4-6 as a springboard to help interpretet the gift of prophecy he says, “(we can) expect special insight to be given by God to any sensitive and obedient believer: insight into God’s will for a specific situation, or into the application of God’s word to the times in which we live. . . .But continuing prophetic ministry is essential today if the church is not going to settle down into a comfortable conformity to contemporary culture.” He links the gift of prophecy to the OT and NT prophets, but without the same standing and authority or the inspiration of “my servants the prophets.” His whole discussion is, for me, very helpful. If you have this commentary check out page 235ff.
Sam
Are you familiar with Grudem’s “The Gift of Prophecy in the NT and Today”? His explanation makes a lot of sense to me.
Also, Alan Knox at http://assembling.blogspot.com/ has a lot of interesting things to say about the format and purpose of church meetings.
The following post gives an index to some of his most interesting posts related to this:
http://assembling.blogspot.com/2008/01/ecclesiology-faq.html
Sam,
I do not own Prior’s BST volume, but will be on the lookout for it.
David,
I am somewhat familiar with Grudem’s work in this area, but have never read the whole volume–just selected portions.
Thanks to both of you for your helpful suggestions!
Boyd
Off-the-wall thought: Are there any New Testament instances of prophecy fulfilled? Of someone predicting the future?
I know Jesus did that when He died and was resurrected, but I can’t recall any others at this moment.
I wonder if that’s indicative of something.
Bob,
The most commonly referred to example is Agabus, who makes near-term propehecies that we know were fulfilled to the letter in Acts 11:27-28 and 21:10-11.
For whatever it’s worth,
Boyd
Boyd,
I didn’t get a chance to check out the
Alan Knox post that David Rogers mentions above until today. The things he has to say seem to me to be most germane to your discussion of what is worship and what is the content of worship from 1C 14. I have seen charismatic/pentecostal worship and, more often, Baptist worship. Permit a bold observation: both groups (including our worship at old First Baptist) may be missing a most valuable worship experience because we are locked into “tradition.” We may just not be “getting it” regarding a prayer, 2 songs, an offering, a song, a special and a sermon with an invitation, then to the river for lunch. I am always fearful I will act out of “knee-jerk reaction,” but there I go again back into the “way we have always done things.”
My words seem too dramatic, but isn’t the worship of God a drama involving human experience to the Divine. How can God be ordinary or business as usual on Sunday morning at 11:00 a.m?
Sam
Sam,
I’m still working on what I think about this area… and writing this blog and interacting with all of you is helping a great deal. But, I know I’m not to where I need to be yet.
Blessings, Boyd